Leading off today:
How much grief might Section 1 administrators have saved themselves had they taken steps earlier this year to communicate some of the findings reported by The Journal News in an absolutely fascinating story
Wednesday digging into the controversial move of last winter's basketball tournaments?
The reporting by Vincent Mercogliano and Richard Liebson indicates unhealthy levels of paranoia and distrust by some of the people in charge of the section, but also offers evidence that the controversial decision to move tournament finals from the Westchester County Center to Pace University was probably prudent.
Though she offered no supporting documentation, Executive Director Jennifer Simmons said the section swung from a profit of only $14,000 for 27 semifinal and championships games at WCC in 2017 to a $39,000 profit for nine finals at Pace in 2018.
Further, the story drew from minutes of sectional Executive Committee meetings to show that administrators' concerns about WCC beyond dollars and cents may have been well-founded. The issues included:
• The Westchester Knicks promoting their G League team and selling merchandise in the arena without offering financial support to the section.
• County officials submitting lengthy lists at the pass gate allowing free admission.
• The arena policy prohibiting outside food or beverage being enforced so strictly that teams bringing their water bottles or sports drinks were forced to throw them out.
Those points of contention were in addition to concerns that were aired publicly leading up to the move to Pace, namely the section not sharing in the $10 per car parking revenue and dismay over the high cost for a police presence at games.
It's fair to ask how public perception and media reporting would have been affected had Section 1 done a better job communicating that sort of information before and after the tournament.
As it is, they could be headed for another contentious decision-making process as plans move forward for selecting venues for the 2019 semifinals and finals. Section 1 will be using request for proposals (RFPs) to solicit proposals from venues to host.
"I do believe that it's not just a dollars and cents calculation," County Executive George Latimer said. "There's something else at hand here. If (Section 1 leaders) really want to show their constituents, then they sit at the table, they negotiate with us and they come back with a deal. And they'll find, as they did earlier this year, a willing partner."
More Section 1: The story from The Journal News that I linked to above contains plenty more "inside baseball" fodder hinting at distrust and dysfunction within the organization's highest ranks, and it really is an amazing read -- quite different than the usual high school sport fare of scores and statistics.
That story contains links to other pieces of a rather extensive package, including a look at a complex -- and yet overly simplistic -- relationship between Section 1 and BOCES